
As we continue our journey through Dell's Animal Comics #4 (Aug-Sept 1943), we come to a story whose writer and artist are uncredited, but who introduced us to a precocious little puppy named Riffraff
COMICS, OLD-TIME RADIO and OTHER COOL STUFF: Random Thoughts about pre-digital Pop Culture, covering subjects such as pulp fiction, B-movies, comic strips, comic books and old-time radio. WRITTEN BY TIM DEFOREST. EDITED BY MELVIN THE VELOCIRAPTOR. New content published every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday & Friday.

As we continue our journey through Dell's Animal Comics #4 (Aug-Sept 1943), we come to a story whose writer and artist are uncredited, but who introduced us to a precocious little puppy named Riffraff


I don't remember how we got into this discussion, but recently, while driving to church, Angela began to tell me about an ethics course she'd taken in college, in which the teacher would give them moral dilemmas. Things like "You are part of a wagon train hiding in a cave from Indians. A baby starts crying. Do you kill the baby to keep it from giving you away or do you allow the Indians to find you and kill everyone?"
Angela's criticism of this is that it was difficult to come up with a definitive "either-or" solution. She felt there was always an Option C or even an Option D after you gave the problem some thought. Human ingenuity was nearly always a wild card tossed into the problem.
Well, as a Totally Geeky Nerd (or would that be Totally Nerdy Geek?), I immediately thought of Tom Godwin's classic short story "the Cold Equations," published in the August 1954 issue of Astounding Science Fiction. By golly, THERE'S a definitive "either-or" moral dilemma.
A pilot is rushing badly needed medicine to a frontier planet. He needs to get that medicine there or a lot of people will die. But then he discovers an 18-year-old girl has stowed away on the ship, because she wanted to visit her brother, who works on that planet. Her extra weight means that the ship no longer has enough fuel to land safely. So the pilot either has to toss her out the airlock or both he and the sick men on the planet all die with her anyways.
It's a story that is justifiably considered a classic. Ironically, Godwin submitted it three times to Astounding's editor John Campbell, each time coming up with a clever way to save the girl. But Campbell kept sending it back until Godwin acknowledged in the story that the laws of physics were immutable. There could be no way to save the girl. Simple mathmatics dictated she must die. Human ingenuity didn't mean a darn thing.
She had unknowingly subjected herself to the penalty of a law that recognized neither innocence nor youth nor beauty, that was incapable of sympathy or leniency.
Angela and I talked about the story for awhile and she agreed that, dramatically, the tragic ending was the proper one for this story. We both, though, were able to get picky about one aspect of the story's general premise. The emergency ship carrying supplies was launched from a large cruiser, which was carrying civilian passengers. The girl had been one of those passengers and she had apparently sneaked aboard the smaller vessel by simply ignoring a KEEP OUT sign. We both felt that any spaceship carrying civilians would by necessity have much better safety precautions on the assumption that sooner or later a civilian would try to do something incredible stupid.
The story has also been criticized by others for being an example of faulty engineering via giving the emergency ship absolutely no margin for error as well.
These are legitimate criticisms, yet the human emotions in the story are so strong and generate so much empathy that "The Cold Equations" still works beautifully.
In a 1991 issue of Analog Science Fiction, Don Sakers published his answer to the original story, in which human ingenuity does provide a gruesome but successful solution, saving the (in this case) young boy and still delivering the medicine. It's a great story (voted the readers' favorite for that year) and still makes it clear that there are consequences for the decisions we make, though one can fairly argue that Sakers gave his pilot a specific piece of equipment and a bit of technology that didn't exist in Godwin's universe. But I do like what Sakers wrote in an Author's Note when the story was anthologized, making it clear that his story was not a condemnation of or lack of appreciation for the original tale:
The important point is not any given solution to this particular scenario... it's something larger, just as Godwin's point was something larger. Just as SF once need to hear that there are times when the girl has to go out the airlock, in 1991 SF needed to hear that the girl doesn't always have to go out the airlock. That there are two ways of looking at the world, and both of them are valid and necessary.
You can find "The Cold Equations" online HERE.






A cover from 1939 (drawn by John Richard Flanagan) shows us you should always bring a gun to a snake fight.


Read/Watch 'em In Order #117
The Mark of the Whistler was released in 1944, the same year as the first film of the series, and gave us another good, solid Film Noir.

This time, the script was an adaptation of a short story titled "Dormant Account," by Cornell Woolrich, which had been published a few years earlier in the May 1942 issue of Black Mask. In that tale, a homeless man named George Palmer poses as someone else to claim a long dormant bank account and scores big when he gets away with it. But it turns out that some not very nice people have it in for the guy Palmer is pretending to be.
The movie is a pretty faithful adaptation of this story, with Richard Dix giving an excellent performance as the story's sort-of protagonist. In the film, he's named Lee Nugent, which is coincidentally the same name as the person who can claim the dormant bank account. That's what gives the normally honest man the idea of running the scam.
He researches the other Lee Nugent, discovering that the other Lee lost his family in a fire when he was twelve, then disappeared when he ran away from the family he was placed with a few years later. Memorizing these facts and rigging up a few other ways to "prove" who he is, our Lee is soon ready to try to fool the bank.
The movie adds a few things to the original story, probably to fill out the plot to squeak the 61-minute film into full-length territory. But in each case, this adds to quality of the story. We get indications that our Lee is essentially a decent person, able to make friends, despite his having given into to temptation regarding the bank account. Both the script and Dix's performance combine to give us this impression, most especially in Lee's interaction with a young boy while researching the other Lee, which makes a difference later on when a particular friend takes risks for him. When that happens, it's believable.

There's also a new character added--a perpetually distrustful clothing store owner (wonderfully brought to life by Porter Hall) who helps Lee run the scam on the bank. Once again, he may have been added to flesh out the film's runtime, but he's a great character that fits perfectly into a Film Noir universe.
As in the original story, the newly enriched Lee soon discovers that the man he is impersonating has enemies. When he realizes someone is after him, he decides that moving to a new city would be a wise option. But it might be too late to get away...

I think both the original story and the film suffer from a very, very unlikely plot twist at the end. But The Mark of the Whistler is, on the whole, a good movie and another strong entry in a strong series.
I own six of the eight Whistler movies on DVD, taped off of TCM a few years ago. The Mark of the Whistler is one of the two I don't own, but I was able to watch it on YouTube. I'm embedding that video below, but please note that I don't know the copyright status of the films, so don't know if it will still be accessible in the future. If it is still under copyright, it might eventually get pulled. So if my future biographers, researching a comprehensive multi-volume biography on how I saved Western culture through my blog, discover that the movie isn't here any more, please note that it's not my fault.
The original short story can be found HERE, reprinted in a 1953 issue of Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine.