Read/Watch ‘em in Order #21
It was during the 1940s that Chester Gould starting
portraying the villains in his comic strip Dick
Tracy as men (and occasionally women) whose grotesque appearances mirrored
their grotesque lack of morals. The 1940s is arguably Gould’s finest decade as
a storyteller. Bad guys such as Prune Face, Shaky, the Brow and Flattop were
tossed into violent storylines that kept the attentions of 30 million readers
riveted on the comics page of their local newspaper.
But when RKO decided to produce a series of Dick Tracy films, they didn’t draw on any of Gould’s established villains. That’s too bad—when you look at what make-up artists of that era were capable of (think of Jack Pierce’s work at Universal), producing an appropriately creepy-looking Brow or Pruneface doesn’t seem too impossible.
But I suppose the time and budget restrictions of B-movie
production prevented this. Still, the Dick Tracy films did pretty good in
coming up with acceptable villains. The first film, as we’ve already seen,
featured Mike Mazurki sporting a vivid scar down his face. The second movie—Dick Tracy vs. Cueball (1946)—tossed shaven-headed
actor Dick Wessel as a brutal thug appropriately named Cueball. Wessel doesn’t
have much range as an actor, but this actually works well for him this time
around—he is a truly menacing presence throughout the film.
As with the first film, Cueball
is a solidly written police procedural, filmed in a shadowy film-noir style
that gives the violence a brutal edge without ever allowing it to become
unpleasantly graphic. Cueball has been hired by some dishonest workers in the
diamond industry to steal some valuable jewels. He proves to be more violent
than they figured, though, when he strangles the courier, then decides to hold
his erstwhile employers up for more money. By the time the movie is over,
Cueball has racked up quite a body count.
It ends with a cool noir-looking chase scene through a busy
railroad yard.
To quote Ron Backer’s excellent book Mystery Movie Series of 1940s Hollywood: “This film contains a
menagerie of wonderful characters, played by wonderful character actors.” Cueball really goes to town with making
the supporting characters individually interesting while giving them the sort
of names that would have fit similar characters perfectly in the comic strips.
The owner of a sleezy bar is Filthy Flora; an antique shop owner is Percival
Priceless; and a gem dealer is named Jules Sparkle.
This is Morgan Conway’s second and last appearance as the
detective. Ralph Byrd, who had played Tracy
in the Republic serials made a few years earlier, would return to the role for
the final two films of the series.
It’s interesting to run across different opinions about
which actor was better. In his book, Ron Backer considers Conway
to be an uninteresting and one-dimensional Tracy. My DVDs of these movies, though,
include very informative introductions by Max Allen Collins, the prolific
mystery writer who wrote the Dick Tracy
strip for over 15 years after Gould retired in 1977. Collins prefers Conway to Byrd, considering Conway to have more authoritative weight in
the role.
Well, I like Conway as Tracy, but I’ve always
preferred Byrd. I will say, though, that my opinion is probably colored by
nostalgia. The first movie Dick Tracy I saw as a kid was a Byrd film (I think
it was an edited feature-length version of one of the serials), so in my mind
he’s always the “real” Tracy.
If I’d seen Morgan Conway first, I’m not sure I wouldn’t prefer him in the
role.
Well, I’ll be watching Ralph Byrd again soon. Next up is
1947’s Dick Tracy’s Dilemma.
No comments:
Post a Comment